A Twist of Cain "The passage "and again she bare his brother Abel," has led some Biblical scholars to speculate that Cain and Abel were twins, also suggested by the constant use of my brother, your brother, further on in the tale - reference: The Interpreter's Bible, vol I, Some interpreters take this to mean that Cain was literally the son of the serpent in the Garden of Eden. Some translation "a breath," "vapor," "transitoriness," which are suggestive of his brief existence and tragic end; others take it to be a variant of Jabal, yabhal, "shepherd" or "herdman," Gen The absence of the verb harah Gen ; compare verse 1 has been taken to imply, perhaps truly, that Cain and Abel were twins.
And that one born of it was CAIN. Gan "When the Devil-possessed Serpent committed fornication with the woman, that animal's seed was planted in her womb and became fused with her egg resulting in the birth of a hybrid - Cain - a perverted seed! Who Is The Serpent of Genesis 3? By Patrick Heron formerly here: www. For he looks like a man as do Gabriel and Michael and, one presumes, all the other created 'sons of God'.
And I would wager that Satan is a very attractive looking man. The Greek expression translated "of the evil one" is ek poneros. The preposition ek denotes origin.
It governs the genitive. The word poneros is clearly not referring to Adam or Adam's Creator. So, does this verse represent the kind of conclusive evidence we're seeking?
If it does, it's not readily apparent. Due to the context of the verse, verse 8 even by itself seems to discount verse 12, declaring that "the one who practices sin is of the devil. Where else can we look for an answer? Let's return to the account of the activity in the Garden of Eden and consider the potential meaning of the figurative language. Then, let's consider the kinds of consequences that came as a result of the activity, knowing how the Author of the Bible has a very refined sense of justice and legality.
Where punishment is mandated it fits the crime. The penalties and consequences are suitable according to the principle of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Of course, we'd like to take everything the Bible says literally and in a straightforward way wherever possible, but the truth isn't always revealed in such a way. Much is concealed by way of figurative language. If you're not familiar with what I wrote about the Keys to Developing a Hearing Ear let me encourage you to become familiar.
When the account of the Garden activity refers to trees and eating their fruit, what else could be meant beyond the obvious? I'm going to get right to the point with this first example. At this statement, many who heard it but couldn't get their minds wrapped around it took offense and took off.
The Lord had been teaching using metaphorical references to his body as bread before and after using the reference to his flesh and blood. Then the LORD God said, "Behold, the man has become like one of Us, knowing good and evil; and now, he might stretch out his hand, and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever".
If you equate the tree of life with the bread of life you have another way of considering the activity in the Garden. Let's consider why the metaphor of eating is used. When you eat something, it's subsequently digested and something of it's assimilated. It becomes part of your body, of you, it abides in you. Now, beyond the food metaphor I want you to make note of the family relationship theme in the context.
When you read the whole context while looking for it you become aware of the frequent and rather conspicuous reference to family relationship. There's a weaving back and forth through the bread of life eating and the father and son themes.
This is what we call a clue. The very profound truth hidden here is that food is to the eater like a father is to a son. Something of food is imparted to the eater, which becomes part of them. Something of a father is imparted to the son, which becomes part of them. Get it? Genetic material is transferred from father to son as nutrients are transferred from food to eater.
Read the context again with this understanding. Natural food relates to physical life. The genetic material "food" relates here to eternal life! The natural eating involves putting things in your mouth and chewing them up. The other kind of eating is procreative. The Jews who were grumbling in verses 41 and 42 were at least in the right ballpark with their reasonings, which again, appears for our benefit as a clue.
How does He now say, 'I have come down out of heaven'? When the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was desirable to make one wise, she took from its fruit and ate; and she gave also to her husband with her, and he ate. Any tree that might be seen as desirable to make one wise is no ordinary kind like we might encounter in a walk through an orchard.
A tree that might be seen as "good for food" does not necessarily mean it's expected to provide a meal. Remember, in the language of John 6 the eating of food equates to procreation, to sexual reproduction. I submit to you that this action of taking the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil and eating it is no different. Folks misunderstood John 6. Could it be that Genesis 3 is misunderstood for the same reason? The truth is cloaked in figurative language, yet, it's not beyond discovery!
The seed of a tree is in the fruit. When you eat the fruit, you eat the seed. Trees are reproduced by way of their fruit. Let this sink in. The activity in the Garden was procreative.
The notable feature of a tree is that it has seed in itself, reproducing after its kind! If you do word studies on "grass" and "tree" you find both are used metaphorically. Grass sometimes represents men, emphasizing the frailty and relative brevity of this life of the flesh.
The grass is "tender," you see. A primary feature of the tree metaphor is the reproductive capability, as also indicated in the account of creation. Trees reference either men or heavenly beings or an entire family in figurative usage in the Bible and in apocryphal and extra-biblical literature. There's a saying you may find familiar: "The acorn or, apple doesn't fall far from the tree. It compares to the expression: "Like father, like son. You'll be thinking along these lines as you review some examples of figurative usage from the Bible.
But I was like a gentle lamb led to the slaughter; And I did not know that they had devised plots against me, saying, "Let us destroy the tree with its fruit, And let us cut him off from the land of the living, That his name be remembered no more. He will be like a tree firmly planted by streams of water, Which yields its fruit in its season And its leaf does not wither; And in whatever he does, he prospers. I found Israel like grapes in the wilderness;I saw your forefathers as the earliest fruit on the fig tree in its first season But they came to Baal-peor and devoted themselves to shame,And they became as detestable as that which they loved.
And all the host of heaven will wear away, And the sky will be rolled up like a scroll; All their hosts will also wither away As a leaf withers from the vine, Or as one withers from the fig tree. From these examples you should understand that when you read in the Bible about trees and their fruit or leaves the reference may actually be to men or heavenly beings and their offspring, or, their procreative ability. I'll present one last example of this class of figures, one that relates specifically to the trees in the Garden of Eden.
For they have all been given over to death, to the earth beneath, among the sons of men, with those who go down to the pit.
And its many waters were stopped up, and I made Lebanon mourn for it, and all the trees of the field wilted away on account of it. Yet you will be brought down with the trees of Eden to the earth beneath; you will lie in the midst of the uncircumcised, with those who were slain by the sword So is Pharaoh and all his hordes!
Now, we've got a foundation on which to build towards discovering who fathered Cain. If we interpret the description of the activity in the Garden according to those same principles we have an intriguing alternative to consider!
Are you grasping how there's a legitimate interpretation that doesn't involve people picking an apple-like object from a tree, putting it in their mouths, chewing and swallowing? Keep what Y'shua taught in John 6 in mind. The food that is the fruit of the tree is a father's genetic material. To eat the fruit of a tree is to receive the father's seed.
What, or, who, is the other tree of note in the midst of the Garden? Could it be that the tree of knowledge of good and evil is the reproductive aspect of the serpent being? In many artistic renderings of the scene in the Garden, the serpent is pictured winding around the tree of knowledge of good and evil like a helical strand of DNA.
These images are inspired from somewhere, are they not? While any artistic rendering of a scene carries no authority of itself, images may present lies and they may also conceal and reveal truths. Have you ever given thought to how the language of the procreative act between Adam and Eve is similar to the descriptive reference to this tree?
This is the tree of "knowledge" of good and evil. Adam "knew" Eve his wife. Genesis The Hebrew words rendered "knowledge" and "knew" are different, but the meanings as interpreted are valid and the point I'm making is no technical stretch. Think, "tree of carnal knowledge of good and evil. Now, with an awareness of some relevant figurative language let's reconsider the activity in the Garden as more of a sex orgy than a light snack.
Sex orgy? It's time to put aside our naivete. Satan is bad. We need to see things for what they are, with no whitewashing, no cover-up. I'm assuming here that we're mature adults.
I'm not going to buffer you from the truth, even though the truth is hard to accept. I'll present the scenario as revealed to me. Then I'll lead you through the consequences of the sin as they relate to the nature of the sin. Eve was seduced by the serpent. Their interaction was sexual and it resulted in conception. Adam wasn't deceived yet he was persuaded to join in. He was stimulated to the point of ejaculation with the result that he "spilled his seed" on the ground. Online User and Order Help.
MARC Records. Titles No Longer Published by Brill. Latest Key Figures. Latest Financial Press Releases and Reports. Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. Share Information. Specialty Products. Catalogs, Flyers and Price Lists. Open Access. Open Access for Authors.
Open Access and Research Funding. Open Access for Librarians. Open Access for Academic Societies. About us. Stay updated. Corporate Social Responsiblity. Investor Relations. Review a Brill Book. Reference Works. Primary source collections. Open Access Content. Need are from the line of Judea this cause the collapse of the 12 tribes.
Now you have 2 nations Israel and Judea or Jerusalem that is proven fact. Now into Cain and Abel. Do not go by any religion for as above was explained, the first Hebrews. Cain was only a half brother his father is and was and will always be Baal of Satan. Proof is out there do your research base on ancient texts not any thing after the fall of Is real for it read it says and Satan whispered to Cain. Jul 19, Rating Race NEW by: Anonymous Some Anonymous has given a comment that white dominated countries are success states and Black dominated states like Africa and India are failed states as Drugs, sex and corruption is filled in those countries and they are descendants of cain.
As far as the Black dominated countries are concerned they are much less infected with Drugs, sex and corruption than the white dominated countries. I too somewhat feel that cain was not the son of Adam and as science tells its not the colour of the skin but the gene which tells what kind of person he or she is.
Cain's decedents need not be only black but a white too. There are more white cain's decendats than black descendants. Sep 29, Rating Cain is Adams biological son. So how does anyone get that Satan had intercourse with Eve and that Cain was the result?
Mar 12, Rating Fruit by: Anonymous It was not a giant fig! It was fruit, as in fruit of the womb! Feb 13, Rating Geneologies by: Anonymous The Bible is meticulous when it comes to geneaologies of people.
As I said Cain is not listed anywhere in the geneaologies of Adam. Even the New Testament confirms this: 1 John "Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Feb 13, Rating RACE by: Anonymous I think I have given enough circumstancial evidence to show that the "serpent" was a black man in this particular story. I have given many such examples.
If the different is race is ONLY melanin then why don't you go live in Harlem or in any of the many failed African states, or in India? Everywhere where there is not white majority rule countries end in failure, high crime rates, corruption, murder, drugs and death! Is it so hard to believe that one of the core beliefs in the Bible - even from the time of Adam and Eve and a law against race mixing. Is it so hard to believe that God created races totally different and intended them to remain different?
Feb 12, Rating Cont. Much of this today is done on purpose to further divide Christianity so we are easier to conquer. The 'fruit' in the Books of Adam and Eve is said to be a huge fig. Those books are worth reading to get an understanding in a literary sense of what may have happened after the fall from YHWH God. Regardless if the fruit was literal or figurative the occult has long declared Satan is the father of Cain some even go so far as to declare Satan and his wife Lilith are the parents of Cain.
Some say it's not in body but in spirit that they possessed Adam and Eve and polluted Cain's soul. For the races. I've never understood why everyone assumes Adam and Even were the same skin color? Absent of any codified scripture that says Adam and Eve were the same skin color there may be I find it suitable to include Eve may have been different than Adam since she was the first to disobey YHWH God.
To me a lot can be seen for what the differences are in how the sexes relate to one another. To me it's similar to how women wish their man was as a god and expect man to be and act as a god. Eve notices her nakedness and if she had just waited until her death and left Adam alone then Adam may not have eaten the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Also the Holy Bible doesn't say where the other people came from that dwelt in the land of Nod. More likely that YHWH God created them after the fall since a whole new reality was then put in place to defeat satan and evil.
The Holy Bible is a story about one line of people and from that line we're all supposed to have salvation. The fictional component of this and today's occult as in the dunn dunnnnn Illuminati is the novel and movies Planet of the Apes.
Fallen man is represented as the Apes and Illuminated man is man. As the story goes the Apes discover knowledge and soon overrun Illuminated man, so to try and keep us the cattle the Apes in check Illuminated man has many tricks at their disposal. To keep it from getting novel length I'll close with saying we're still fighting the same battles as man has always fought since the fall, only technology is different and is giving illuminated man powers that are similar to what the fallen ones possessed before YHWH God separated the realms during the flood.
Earth 1. Well, you will never find it because the Garden of Eden was destroyed in the flood. Talking about "Black man" also does not make sense. Black is merely melanin to protect man from the sun's radiation. Without Melanin, you risk having sun burns. So, questioning the Almighty's creation here makes no suense. Finally, we know the name of Eve's husband who is Adam.
There were not two men in the Garden of Eden. We know of the process of creation from the dust; and the creation of Eve from Adam's ribs. No other creation is recorded. Only God can create man and other beings or man.
The Serpent was just that: the Serpent in Genesis and the same Serpent in the Revelations -- in the beginning and in the end. So your theory is incorrect. Cain's father was Adam; his mother was Eve. Enjoy this page? Please pay it forward. Here's how Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it? Click on the HTML link code below. Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.
Average Rating Click here to add your own comments. Nov 01, Rating. Oct 07, Rating. Aug 25, Rating. Jul 14, Rating. Cain's father NEW by: Anonymous ok. May 27, Rating. Racist author NEW by: Anonymous Okay guy, trying to prove that black men were evil to protect the white man image is absurd.
May 17, Rating. Apr 21, Rating. Mar 04, Rating.
0コメント